Alfonzo lopez, a 12th grade high school student, carried a concealed weapon into his san antonio, texas high school. The court was thus upholding its duty by striking it down. Lopez, decided april 26, 1995, raises the question of whether the federal government will now suffer a wave of losses in the courthouse. This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the united states reports. Lopez case was the first united states supreme court case since the early 1930s to create laws that limit congresss power. Only states have the authority to ban guns in school zones. The next day, the state charges were dismissed after federal agents charged lopez with violating a federal criminal statute. Audio transcription for oral argument november 08, 1994 in united states v. In his appeal, he brought suit against the united states government plaintiff, challenging the constitutionality of the gfsza as a regulation based on congresss commerce clause power. United states court of appeals tenth circuit united states of america, plaintiff appellee, v. He brought a concealed handgun into his high school and thus ran afoul of a federal statute known as the gunfree school zones act of 1990. With this presumption of constitutionality in mind, we turn to. Breyer says he will use three principles of commerce clause interpretation to answer the question before the court.
Lopez audio transcription for opinion announcement april 26, 1995 in united states v. He was convicted on three of the counts in district court. Congress may regulate local intrastate activities so long as they significantly affect. Lopez 2 marks the first time in almost sixty years that the supreme court has held that congress had exceeded its power to regulate interstate commerce. Lopez certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit no.
He was charged under texas law with firearm possession on school premises. I have the opinion of the court to announce the number 931260, united states versus lopez. On march 10th of 1992, lopez carried a concealed handgun into school. He brought a concealed handgun into his high school and thus ran afoul of a federal statute known as the gunfree. Lopez 1995, the supreme court ruled that congress had exceeded its constitutional authority under the commerce clause when it passed a law prohibiting gun possession in local. May 01, 2016 quick, yet detailed summarization of the united states v. Congress, in enacting the legislation, had exceeded its authority under the commerce clause in march 1992 alfonso lopez, jr. The education of our youth has a major impact on the national economy and is a proper subject for the commerce clause regulation. In a majority decision joined by four other justices, chief justice.
In part i of this article, i consider the lopez case, paying particular attention to ideas. The following week, respondent informed fahle that he wanted low to be his only attorney. Filed october 24, 2001 united states court of appeals. Argued april 18, 2006decided june 26, 2006 respondent hired attorney low to represent him on a federal drug charge. Gonzalezlopez certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the eighth circuit no.
The fifth circuit court of appeals reversed the conviction, finding that the federal law was unconstitutional. Argued october 3, 2006decided december 5, 2006 the immigration and nationality act ina lists as an. Prior to trial, lopez filed a motion to suppress the recorded evidence, and the motion was denied. Lopez, which declared the gun free school zones act an unconstitutional overreach, was seen by some experts. Thus, the government argued that the possession of a firearm at a school fell under the jurisdiction of the commerce clause of the united states. Its prohibitions are keyed to the imposition of an excise tax on the business of dealing in such weapons and on transfers of them, together with related requirements for registration of the dealer, the. Gonzales, attorney general certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the eighth circuit no. The act neither regulates commercial activity, nor contains a requirement that the possession be connected in any way to interstate commerce.
Supreme court case that declared as unconstitutional the gunfree school zones act of 1990, which made it a federal crime to have a gun within 1,000. The court held that parts of the violence against women act of 1994 were unconstitutional because they exceeded the powers granted to congress under the commerce clause and the fourteenth amendments equal protection clause. Second, like the statute at issue in lopez, 981 contains no jurisdictional. In the supreme court the us v lopez case was heard in november, 1994 and decided in april, 1995 under chief justice william rehnquist. Gun possession is not an economic activity that has any impact on interstate commerce, whether direct or indirect, so the federal government cannot base a law prohibiting gun possession near schools on the commerce clause. Justia us law us case law us supreme court volume 514 united states v. It was the first case since 1937 in which the court held that congress had exceeded its power to legislate under the commerce clause. The district court denied his application without comment. Lopez, the united states supreme court stated that congress has the broad power to make laws under the clause, but these powers were limited and did not extend to the areas of the lopez case. Supreme court of the united states syllabus united states v.
Defendant juan manuel lopezgarcia appeals the sentence entered in this. The united states governments main argument against lopez consisted of several parts. The united states court of appeals for the first circuit affirmed. The court of appeals for the fifth circuit agreed with lopez and reversed his conviction. Low then filed an application for admission pro hac vice. Readers are requested to notify the reporter of decisions, supreme court of the united states, washington, d. A high school senior was convicted for bringing a gun to his school, which congress made a federal crime under the gun free school zones act. In the gunfree school zones act of 1990, congress made it a federal offense for any individual knowingly to possess a firearm at a place that the individual knows, or has reasonable cause to believe, is a school zone.
Lopez affects interstate commerce, the court focused on the impact that upholding the act would have on state sovereignty. Lopez 1995, the supreme court ruled that congress had exceeded its constitutional authority under. Lopez 1995, the united states supreme court declared the gunfree school zones act of 1990 an unconstitutional overreach of the implied powers of congress under the commerce clause. In joining the courts opinion, justice clarence thomas argued that commerce power. This article will argue that lopez does so by implicitly combining two previously. Gonzalezlopez opinion of the court lated a court rule restricting the crossexamination of a witness to one counsel.
Although the defense did not focus on entrapment, the trial court judge provided jury instructions on the issue. Argued november 8, 1994decided april 26, 1995 after respondent, then a 12thgrade student, carried a concealed handgun into his high school, he was charged with violating the gunfree school. Lopez was a landmark supreme court case that concerned the degree to which congress could utilize the substantial effects doctrine under the commerce clause. Lopez 1995 summary this month we spotlight the landmark 1995 federalism case u. Ann althouse, enforcing federalism after united states v. Jan 21, 2011 a summary of supreme court case united states vs. The case arose from a san antonio high school students challenge to the gunfree school zones act of 1990, which banned possession of handguns near schools. Group project for ap government spring 2011, boernesamuel v. After half a century of rulings that resulted in the expansion of congresss power, the courts ruling in u.
Chief justice rehnquist delivered the opinion of the court. Congress, in enacting the legislation, had exceeded its authority under the commerce clause. Quick, yet detailed summarization of the united states v. A case in which the court found the 1990 gunfree school zones act unconstitutional for overstepping the congressional boundaries of the commerce clause. Lopez was a high school senior in san antonio, texas. The united states is a government of enumerated powers. Lopez is the first supreme court decision in almost sixty years to strike down a federal statute regulating private activity as being beyond congress legislative power under the commerce. Order and judgment before bacharach, mckay, and murphy, circuit judges. Supreme court on april 26, 1995, ruled 54 that the gunfree school zones act of 1990 was unconstitutional because the u. Mansfields fifth period ap us government and politics class. The commerce power could not merge entirely with the. Argued april 18, 2006decided june 26, 2006 respondent hired attorney low to represent him on a federal. Congress made it a federal crime to possess a firearm in a school zone under the gun free school zones act of 1990 the act. Martinezlopez 51 where the divisibility of the two principal aspects of a subsection of a statute are unclear here, the proscribed acts and the proscribed substances it seems evident to me that they should be certified together to the state supreme court to clarify both issues.
The statute prohibited any individual knowingly to possess a firearm at a place. Lopez with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the indian tribes. In determining whether a regulated activity has a significant impact on interstate commerce, it is necessary to consider not a single example of the regulated activity, but rather the cumulative effects of all similar instances of that conduct. The 54 divided decision preserved the system of federalism and reversed the supreme courts 50year trend of rulings that expanded the powers of congress. Lopezs legal defense held that the federal government had no authority to regulate firearms in school zones, and argued that the federal law under which lopez was convicted was unconstitutional. Apr 17, 2017 following is the case brief for united states v.
Supreme court of the united states syllabus lopez v. After a halfcentury of deference to congressional legislation, the supreme court in united states v. Rodriguez failed to raise this argument until his reply brief, he has waived it. The power of congress to regulate activities extends only to those activities that substantially affect interstate commerce. Joining the liberals in the majority were conservatives scalia and kennedy, who have been. Martinezlopez 5 health and safety code section 152, whichlike many california drug statutescriminalizes a variety of. Is congress given the power to regulate guns in schools under the commerce clause. Opinion of the court commerce, and the business of elementary, middle and high schools. The supreme court second appeal describe the current situation court lopez appealed to the fifth circuit court of appeals they reversed the decision, ruling that the law was beyond the reach of congresss power under the commerce clause article 1, section 8, clause 3 of the u.
56 1546 83 1312 1315 91 112 1548 1434 1023 783 1081 1513 63 1450 260 1287 493 567 779 1260 290 133 628 1052 734 63 97 1415 1089 644 1443 529 1158 1020